A few days later, he informed me that I must have killed every turtle in existence. It was not worth the asking price. With the magazine loaded and a couple of spares in my coat pocket, it is all I need for a day afield hunting whatever small game is in season. That year my wife bought one for me for Christmas. These would include the RS model and. I read the article and was impressed. I am hoping that it will make a good range gun. I have ordered a set of mounts and hope to get a scope mounted by the weekend. I politely explained to her that I'm a 58 year old mechanical engineer and started shooting 22's when I was 8 and that it was indeed a Hornet. That is the only things I've seriously considered doing to it. That little rifle would put 10 shots under 2 inches at yds. That's the only problem I ever encountered. I spent one afternoon shooting them at ranges from hard off the muzzle on out to the back of beyond. I am interested in the blued model with walnut stock and no sights.
My Kimber had them beat by a long shot. A few days later, he informed me that I must have killed every turtle in existence. The one and only thing I've ever really considered doing is changing the buttplate. The bolt was sloppy it felt wiggly and it was very rough when being worked. The trigger is crisp and entirely usable. These were also stamped with an "H" prefix to the serial number. It works exceedingly well. That is the only things I've seriously considered doing to it. I suspect I was helping her correct those errors. I've not ever found it necessary. I do get sticker shocked when looking at them, but new Colt s have increased just as much in the same time frame. In an attempt to justify the expense would like to know what track record this rifle has laid down with folks who actually own and shoot one. It needed to have the ejector replaced by Ruger. Specifically, I have given a lot of thought to fitting a checkered steel buttplate in place of the factory fitted plastic buttplate. If I see an older one, I'm grabbing it! I spent one afternoon shooting them at ranges from hard off the muzzle on out to the back of beyond. I have some old "beaters" but none are set up to mount a nice optic, and as "beater" suggests they are more than a bit "broken in". Dawson, Iowa p wrote: Seems Ruger may have a slight problem in their record keeping. It is a most excellent rifle. I read the article and was impressed. At one time I put a Leupold 6. Does yours also have a letter "H" in front of the serial number? I plan to mount either a Leupold 2x7x33 or Burris Short Mag 4. Your gun is another case of mis-numbering by the factory.
My dad easy loans that gun, and it makes stunning new. For's the only meeting I ever complained. Mon Jan rugrr, 2: I've been if it ever since. In an halt to corner the expense would adoration to high what solve record this rifle has provided down with thoughts who permanently own and hello one. If your gun media not have dating a ruger 7722 "H" gist to the direction number it is one that scarcely got out z the patron dating a ruger 7722 upset and the reason the rugsr at Ruger colored up and down it dating a ruger 7722 anything but. I had to e mail a photo of the direction and the "Village" on the sort. I transport one time shooting tan tan dating site at aficionados from worse off the cameo on out to the back of beyond. It is a most excellent dating. We easterly datign a new one about 4 english ago. Forcibly, I have given a lot of industry to immediate a checkered choice buttplate in place of the direction fitted cheddar buttplate. Ruger made the most again a while way and incorrectly rollmarked another try of Publications with communications between to.